
Unlock exclusive
FyscalTech Content & Insights
Subscribe now for best practices, research reports, and more.
The Great Banking Infrastructure Inflection Point
The banking industry stands at a defining moment. While executives debate whether to modernise or maintain legacy systems, the numbers tell an unforgiving story: global banks will spend $57 billion annually by 2028 simply maintaining outdated payment systems up from $36.7 billion in 2022. This represents a staggering 7.8% compound annual growth rate in purely defensive spending.
Over 73% of major banks plan to replace their core systems by 2027 not out of choice, but necessity as legacy infrastructure has shifted from burden to strategic liability. With 55% of executives citing core systems as the biggest barrier to digital transformation, the urgency lies not just in matching fintech disruptors but in preserving market relevance amid rapidly evolving customer expectations.
The $1.14 Trillion Legacy Crisis
Legacy banking systems weren't designed for today's digital economy. Built during the mainframe era when banks operated through physical branches and batch processing, these monolithic architectures now constrain every aspect of modern banking operations.
The maintenance burden alone is crippling institutions. Banks dedicate 55% of their IT budgets often exceeding $100 million annually for Tier 1 institutions to simply keeping outdated systems operational. This leaves only 19% of technology spending available for innovation, effectively starving banks of resources needed to compete. The human capital crisis compounds this challenge: maintaining COBOL-based systems (still used by 43% of U.S. banks) requires specialized programmers costing $250 per hour versus $90 for modern stack engineers.
The operational risks multiply exponentially. Legacy systems expose banks to cybersecurity vulnerabilities that cost an average of $6.08 million per breach significantly above the cross-industry average. Singapore regulators imposed over SGD1 billion in additional capital charges on one major bank due to service disruptions caused by aging infrastructure. Meanwhile, only 30% of core banking transformations successfully migrate systems to modern platforms, creating a vicious cycle where failed modernization attempts further entrench technological debt.
These aren't isolated technical problems they represent systemic failures that prevent banks from delivering real-time services, implementing AI-driven insights, or responding to regulatory changes with the agility modern markets demand.
Why Vendor-Agnostic Core Modernization Liberates Banks from Vendor Control
Vendor-agnostic modernization fundamentally redefines banking technology architecture, delivering strategic outcomes far beyond traditional core replacements.
- Institutional Freedom vs. Vendor Convenience : Banks control technology direction, aligning systems with strategy and reducing risk from future vendor changes.
- Modular, API-First Architecture : Modular API-first platforms enable seamless connections, fast upgrades, and integration of specialized solutions from multiple providers.
- Architectural Flexibility : Vendor-agnostic platforms spread risk, preventing dependency and allowing smooth upgrades of individual system components as needed.
- Risk Distribution : Banks accelerate innovation by integrating new tech rapidly, reducing costs and speeding product launches by up to 40%.
- Innovation Acceleration : Banks accelerate innovation by integrating new tech rapidly, reducing costs and speeding product launches by up to 40%.
End-to-end automation in loan processing turns speed into a competitive advantage, driving trust, loyalty, and market-share gains in a digital-first financial landscape.

How Banks Can Escape the Legacy Maintenance Trap
Legacy System Challenges and Vendor-Agnostic Modernisation Benefits
- Modern banking requires real-time processing and agility; legacy systems built for batch processing cannot meet these demands.
- Banks spend 15-20% of IT budgets on legacy upkeep often $100M+ annually for large institutions.
- Maintenance costs rise ~15% yearly as specialized skills become scarce; IT teams lose up to 25 hours weekly patching systems.
- Legacy systems block API integration, preventing open banking participation, fintech collaboration, AI adoption, and real-time fraud detection.
- They cannot scale dynamically for transaction surges, unlike cloud-native environments with auto-scaling capabilities.
Legacy banking systems are costly, rigid, and hinder digital agility, while vendor-agnostic modernization reduces maintenance spend, enables scalable, API-driven innovation, and frees IT to focus on value creation positioning banks for sustained competitive advantage in a fast-changing market.
Why Speed and Agility Matter: How Modernization Accelerates Product Innovation
The banking industry’s competitive landscape has shifted dramatically as digital-native challengers launch new products in weeks, while traditional banks with legacy systems take months or years. These outdated systems cause delays and complexity, fragment customer data, and prevent real-time analytics needed for personalized, automated services. Vendor-agnostic modernization overcomes these challenges by enabling fast, modular, API-first integration and cloud-native scalability. Banks adopting this approach achieve up to three times faster product launches, creating a sustainable competitive edge that grows stronger as market demands evolve.
How Diversifying Technology Vendors Reduces Risk and Boosts Flexibility
Traditional core banking systems create significant risks by concentrating dependency on a single vendor, exposing banks to that provider’s strategic limitations, operational failures, and business risks. Vendor lock-in results in limited negotiating power, higher costs, delayed features, and volatility when vendors face financial or security challenges. Operational rigidity also restricts banks from adopting best-of-breed solutions, leading to outdated capabilities in critical areas like fraud detection and payments, which undermines competitiveness and complicates necessary upgrades.
In contrast, vendor-agnostic architectures distribute risks by integrating multiple specialized providers through modular designs, eliminating single points of failure. This approach enhances strategic flexibility, enabling banks to switch vendors if needed and incorporate emerging technologies without disruption. It transforms vendor relationships into partnerships based on mutual value, improving negotiating power and responsiveness. Financial institutions adopting vendor-agnostic strategies experience reduced vendor-related risks and a stronger ability to seize market opportunities, turning vendor dependency into competitive leverage.
Transforming Banking Infrastructure into Competitive Advantage
Vendor-agnostic core modernisation cuts costs by 20-40%, speeds product launches, and turns technology into a strategic advantage. It builds agility to adapt quickly to market changes, reduces risks tied to single vendors, and enables rapid adoption of emerging technologies, ensuring sustained competitive leadership.

How FT Enables Seamless Core System Modernisation
Fyscal Technologies helps banks replace legacy core systems by delivering vendor-agnostic, API-first, and modular core modernization solutions. We design flexible architectures that integrate best-of-breed fintech and enable rapid product innovation without vendor lock-in. Through cloud-native platforms, automation, and AI integration, Fyscal empowers banks to reduce operational costs, accelerate time-to-market, enhance customer experiences, and maintain regulatory compliance all while minimizing risk and ensuring seamless phased transitions from legacy infrastructure. Our approach positions banks for agility and sustained competitive advantage in the digital era.
Why Acting Now Is Critical: The Modernization Imperative for Banks
The statistics are undeniable: 73% of banks will replace their core systems by 2027 not because they want to, but because they must. The $57 billion annual legacy maintenance burden by 2028 represents resources that could drive innovation, competitive differentiation, and market expansion instead of merely keeping outdated systems operational.
The choice facing banking executives isn't whether to modernise it's whether to embrace vendor-agnostic approaches that deliver genuine strategic advantages or pursue traditional replacements that merely create new dependencies. The institutions that recognize this distinction will shape the future of banking. Those that don't will become cautionary tales of strategic inertia in a digital economy.
The transformation window is narrowing rapidly. As more banks complete vendor-agnostic modernisation and gain competitive velocity, the performance gap with legacy-dependent institutions will become insurmountable. The decision to begin modernization today determines whether your institution will lead the next banking era or struggle to survive it.
Ready to lead the future of banking with vendor-agnostic core modernization?