The $38B Visa & Mastercard settlement reshapes merchant economics. What changes for merchants, fintechs, and the future of payments?
Subscribe now for best practices, research reports, and more.
For years, "swipe fees" (also called interchange fees) have been a source of tension between merchants and card networks. Every time a customer pays with a credit or debit card, the merchant pays a percentage of that transaction to the card network and issuing bank usually between 1.5% and 3.5%.
Merchants have long argued these fees are opaque, anti-competitive, and rising faster than inflation. Visa and Mastercard maintain that interchange supports fraud protection, innovation, and card rewards programmes. This battle dates back to the early 2000s, leading to multiple lawsuits, regulatory reviews, and settlements. But none have been as sweeping as this one.
After more than two decades of courtroom battles, Visa and Mastercard announced a record-breaking $38 billion settlement with U.S. merchants. Here's what it introduces.
Interchange Rates Cut by 0.1% for Five Years. Visa and Mastercard will lower swipe fees by 0.1 percentage point for five years. This can mean millions in annual savings for large retailers. For small businesses, it means slightly better margins.
Standard Consumer Credit Fees Capped at 1.25% for Eight Years. This is one of the biggest structural shifts. Until now, interchange rates fluctuated based on card type and rewards. By capping rates, Visa and Mastercard bring predictability a rare thing in payments economics. However, critics argue that 1.25% remains high compared to the 0.3% cap in the EU.
Merchants Gain More Freedom. Merchants will now have the right to surcharge up to 3% on card transactions. They'll also be allowed to refuse premium or commercial cards, which typically carry higher fees. For the first time, they can actively choose which cards to accept based on economics.
A $21 Million Education Fund. The settlement creates a $21 million fund to help small merchants understand and apply these new rules.
Overall Impact. Merchants could save over $200 billion through the settlement period, according to expert economists.
.svg)
For Merchants.This is the first meaningful concession in years. Small and medium businesses finally gain negotiating leverage. However, the National Retail Federation called the deal "a minor discount on an inflated price," noting that Visa and Mastercard still control over 80% of U.S. card volume.
For Visa & Mastercard.Financially, the settlement is large but strategically, it's a containment move. By settling now, the networks avoid potential antitrust escalation, maintain their core business model, and buy time as they modernise fee structures.
For Consumers.Some merchants might add checkout surcharges for card payments. Certain premium cards might see limited acceptance. In the long run, this could prompt rethinking of card rewards economics. Consumers may trade convenience for price transparency.
For Fintechs and Payment Innovators.Fintechs working in merchant services, payment orchestration, and alternative rails can capitalise on the narrative of "freedom from card lock-in." As merchants become more aware of costs, the door opens wider for routing optimisation, multi-rail orchestration, and real-time settlements.
Despite the headlines, many experts argue the settlement doesn't address the core issue market power concentration. Visa and Mastercard still process over $10 trillion in payments annually in the U.S., and their interchange structure remains fundamentally untouched.
"The settlement trims the edges, but doesn't break the mould," one payments analyst noted. "As long as card networks set the rules for access, merchants remain price-takers, not price-makers."
Still, the deal sets a legal and political precedent. Judge Margo Brodie, who rejected a prior $30 billion settlement in June 2024, has signalled that meaningful reform is expected
The proposed settlement now moves to the U.S. District Court for approval. If approved, implementation is expected in late 2026 or early 2027. Between now and then, expect legal challenges from merchant coalitions seeking stronger terms and state-level discussions around surcharging transparency.
What Happens Next
The proposed settlement now moves to the U.S. District Court for approval. If approved, implementation is expected in late 2026 or early 2027. Between now and the, expect legal challenges from merchant coalitions seeking stronger terms and state-level discussions around surcharging transparency.
For banks and fintechs, this moment presents a unique opportunity. As merchant certainty around costs increases, institutions that can offer flexible, cost-transparent payment infrastructure will win market share. Vendor-agnostic payment orchestration platforms systems that route transactions across multiple networks based on cost and approval likelihood become essential infrastructure.
Institutions designing payment systems with composability, transparency, and multi-rail capabilities from the outset will lead their peers in cost efficiency and regulatory readiness. The settlement signals that payment control is gradually shifting downstream, towards the merchant and the innovator.
This $38 billion deal is more than just a legal resolution it's a moment of reckoning in the evolution of digital payments. For small businesses, it represents progress, even if incremental. For card networks, it's a strategic release valve. And for fintechs, it's a signal that payment economics are being democratised.
The real question isn't how much Visa and Mastercard gave up. It's how the rest of the ecosystem uses this opportunity to rebuild a fairer, more transparent payment landscape.
Ready to explore how Fyscal Technologies can help you design vendor-agnostic payment infrastructure that thrives in this new era?
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
